I’ve been thinking about the internet lately.
And I’ve formed some thoughts about it:
1) It could lead to a micro-response survey towards democratic progress. Imagine a service established where your local, state, and federal representatives are immediately notified of your daily wants, needs, annoyances, grievances. Of course, one would have to sign up for this service and as easy as it is currently to send an email to one’s politicians–apathy usually reigns supreme in democracies. However, with this, individuals could send up to the minute critiques and ideas to their representatives. This will require massive data banking and sorting on the part of the governments.
2) Elitist and exclusivist sects will have a harder and harder time of it. Imagine Scientology’s umbrage about sites like clambake.org, etc. The leaking of high Mormon rites and the disclosure of once occult knowledge will have to ‘change the game’ of how sects are formed and maintained. This goes for the communitas of religious sects also. Home groups and Bible studies being able to meet remotely will shift the expectations of worshippers. This remote worshipping and gathering isn’t so bad an idea for America’s penchant for superchurches. The feasibility for continued stadium-like gathering on a(n at least) weekly basis is unsustainable and grossly wasteful.
3) The nature of education must quickly shift. The fact that America is still beholden to a school model that was created under a rural agrarian culture reveals America’s convervative and regressive tendancies. What does a liberal education look like when one has access to all of the world’s accumulated knowledge? The emphasis upon critical thought and the formation of concise questioning must begin to occur. This no less than a traininng in ethics. The fact that America has fostered a largely imperial, colonizing, and Eurocentric foundation in their education is widely known yet has been completely repealed. Our young must not ‘learn history’ but begin deciphering the many histories and uncover the lost and marginalized histories and narratives that could bring revolutionary thought and action. The puritanical shackles on our public schools glare of hypocrisy and naivete when any youth with a computer can see infinite acts of violent or degrading pornography but must wait until the 5th grade to get a remedial and bashful sexual education.
4) Any individual who lambasts the “mainstream media” for being ’slanted’, or ‘biased’ is uttering words of no worth. We all know that no report is ‘objective’ and no group, publication, or media outlet can possibly come close to offering ‘the truth of the matter’. Everyone is biased. If we’re to talk about bias, let’s take it beyond ‘liberal or conservative’ and look at biases of sex, gender, race, class, etc. And of course, we know that there is no mainstream media in the way that it is usually spoken of. There is now increasingly an information cloud and ‘news’ is necessarily becoming more opinion-entertainment. Why? Because individuals are becoming able to read and watch first hand accounts–from multiple sources. That any cable network is biased is a given. No individual in the internet age can expect to receive information about their world passively. The last and most important filter and search engine will always be the individual’s critical mind.
5) The internet as we know it now is scroll compared to the codex that’s coming. The enhanced reality applications will continue to increase as well as the ‘wetworks’ of cybernetic technology. This means that many will cease to distinguish between “being online” and “being offline”. There will only be the new way of being. In the rare occasions when Americans now are away from electricity, we make note of it: “I was off the grid on my hiking trip.” With the possibility of a near global wi-fi this phenomenon will may be even more rare.
6) Convenient access to the whole of the internet is a universal human right. (Listen up, China!) The Vatican and many ethicists agree: every person has the right to clean drinking water, health care, food, and the internet. This is a turning point in our human culture. This means that international labor unions will begin to arise through grassroots. The advocacy for non-toxic environments going towards permaculture that support dignified living will gain the support of all working class peoples and the production/consumption cycle will be uncovered for the exploitative system that it is. As Mother Jones said, “Organize, organize, organize!” The internet will allow for greater pushback against corporate greed and inhumanity.

The internet is profiting the possibility for greater ethical and critical thought and action to be forwarded by diverse laborers throughout the globe. It also carries the potential to decrease extremism in sectarian beliefs as veils of secrecy and isolated worship are overcome with transparency. More and more the internet will be integrated into our consciousness as a fork, spoon, shoe than a periodic tool used to access a web destination.

Ryan McGivern

Thinking Through and Feeling Where the Wild Things Are

In my analysis of this splendid film, I want to state first off that I understand that I’m pulling some heavy interpretations that may come across like a 1:1 metaphorical statement about what the film is saying. While I believe that these insights into the film can help flesh out one way of seeing the film, I am totally open to many interpretations and understandings of it. That is a mark of good film: Debate and various parsings. What I do want to dissuade others from is a quick dismissal of the film as ‘depressing’, or ‘dark’.

When I have heard or read others’ reactions to the film including that it is boring, depressing, etc. I have not heard them relate to the film in its mythic level. This to me seems telling when the movie is essentially a step by step hero’s journey with resonances of course to pop-psych, religious, and spiritual motifs. If there are reviews of the film which include why it fails as a mythic quest, I have not seen them and I welcome being turned on to them.

So let me pull no punches. Right off I’ll tell you that I quickly saw the film taking a ‘vision quest’ or hero’s journey type of narrative. This influenced my entire viewing and once I’d locked onto that format, it was hard for me to not see it otherwise. This is the trap of all rigid worldviews, isn’t it? Well, I’m guilty here. But I will say that it made the movie flow quite coherently and endearingly so with fresh interpretations and statements about many of our contemporary conditions.

I’ll also say there’s a bounty of spoilers ahead. If you haven’t seen it, stop here. Also: what’s up with people saying this is or isn’t a children’s movie? Why is that even on the radar? “Because of the book it derives its title and images from, you dullard!” you scream back. But Jonze has repeatedly said that it is an adult’s movie that is about childhood so enough of that. I would say that the youngest a person could be and enjoy the film would be roughly around ten years old.

So anywho: Max, the protagonist (and white male hero figure—haven’t we had enough of these? Didn’t Keanu kind of put the exclamation mark on that stereotype?) is a youth on the cusp of puberty and is living in a fantasy world of unbridled energy. He terrorizes the family dog, he believes that other’s attention should be unwavering from him, that his mother is an extension of himself, and that other’s should play by his own rules (the snowball fight that escalates to a level that is beyond his control or comfort). Ultimately, he is an unchecked ego in the full exuberance of childhood.

But his world is crumbling around him. His sister has developed friendships and possibly romantic interests that are consuming her attention. His mother and father are divorced and mother’s new romantic interest is invading the pacific and Max centered family unit.

We are to understand that Max’s life is an island where his needs and identity rule unchecked. Even from the title card credits, Max has scrawled his name over the production houses’ logos. His name gets etched into the boat, and he plants a garbage bag flag on his snow pile like a colonizing Lord. His interest in self expression and unique spirit are not at issue here. It is his inability to be responsive to the shared social world he is slowly being birthed into. He is reaching the ‘age of accountability’, individuation from his mother, and connecting his actions to consequences.

A number of important events lead to his hero’s journey or spur him on to his crises among the Wild Things.
He learns of the mortality or changingness of all things. Everything changes, flows, dies, transforms. Marriages dissolve, sisters grow up, new relationships begin, and the childhood years of irresponsibility ultimately end. This is a core tenet to many spiritual teachings. This knowledge pushes one to focus on the bedrock values within themselves and their society. Max is faced with not only the mortality of himself and others around him, but the world and indeed the solar system when the Sun itself will transform. We must come to terms with our Earth’s future demise—and face an ethical response to it and the other life that lives on it. Will we cower at this with ignorance or apathy? Will we foolheartedly welcome it with misguided apocalypticism, dreaming of a blood drenched and sword welding Christ? Or will we dissolve ego, see past the lies of a culture of rabid consumption, and humble ourselves in compassion? Anywho, I digress. Max sees death before him, like Guatama on his chariot ride.

Max experiences fear of loss. He had given his heart (in card form) to his sister. When his sister ‘betrays’ him by not standing up for him and his defeated snow fort, he tramples on the card he had made for his sister. His destruction of the heart shaped card is intended to hurt his sister but it hurts him also. One may never lash out at another, hate another, or withdraw love from another without harming oneself, after all. With the help of mom, he performs a mea culpa and tries to restore his sister’s room to its previous condition but as we know physical damages may be patched up but the emotional and psychological effects will ripple much longer. The buildings and neighborhood of New Orleans can and will be restored, but what of the people living there who experienced the largely racialized betrayal of their government? His loss of his sister and the loss of his mother are largely connected—as well as the loss of the father we can presume who is not seen in the film. His repentance towards his sister is connected also to the third event…

Max commits violences towards his mother. Standing on a table he screams, “Feed me woman!” Is this a gendered attack that he had heard from his father? The leering wolf-suited Max stars at his mother from the kitchen table, the demanding male in a house whose status as ‘head’ is being challenged all around. After the divorce, perhaps Max had become accustomed to being the only male presence in the house and now he’s got mother’s new boyfriend in the other room drinking wine and laughing. Max then lashes out and bites his mother-the mouth that like Remus and Romulus had suckled from a wolf had nursed at his mother is now like a wolf biting her. He then runs away into the night and thus begins his journey.

Like any good mythic journey, we’ve got to traverse water—the symbol of the unconscious. He sets off in escape, or adventure? We know that his is a journey that will resolve in his return. This is a circular journey, following the Eastern narrative. The hero leaves, finds his boon, wisdom, transformation, spirit animal, or weapon and returns to his fold.

The first thing Max sees is a fire on the hill. Is this civilization? Hope? A warming fire? No, it is destruction and madness. Appropriately Max finds Carol (the Wild Thing representing his dominant characteristics) crushing bird-nest-like houses. What should be sheltering and a symbol of safety is being crushed by Carol’s actions. I won’t get into too much detail (really?) about the Wild Things, but Max finds semblances of his sister, mother, facets of himself, and presumably others there. These are his spirit animals, perhaps, or his more properly his ‘demons’ in need of taming and stand-ins for the others in his life which he must live with ethically.

Max is crowned King. Of course! This is his new snow fort, his world and he is the unquestioned ruler of it. This is the seductive power of the Dark Side, if I may borrow from Yoda. It is a human experience to want to rule, command, dictate. We may not seek CEO positions or great wealth. We don’t need to. This comes in many expressions: wanting to win each argument, defend yourself when you’re in the wrong, disregard others, etc. The Wild Things reveal that many kings have died and been eaten by them. As it is! Yes, the combat we must face daily with our desire to be right, be served, be gluttons, be God’s ‘elect’, be ‘better than’, is mortal combat. It is perilous. Max will only survive in the end by giving up his crown and declining kingship. This is the Christ teaching that we can all emulate. By accepting a crown of hardship and service to the marginalized and cast-off rather than glory we can survive and succeed in honor.

Max then goes through a journey that has meaning at personal, familial, and political levels.
He tries to create a mono culture—a universal and totalizing system. He is King and his saying is final. This is the desire of egoistic systems—Hegelianism, reductive materialism, maculinist systems of power, exclusivist religious systems, etc. This does not work. Communities, relationships, and power dynamics occlude a universalized or single, easy answer.
Max tries by his design to create a Utopian community. Again, a ‘city’ (really just a bigger bird’s nest) is made with hopes that technology and progress will cure the ‘ailments’ of ethical relations. It does not. There remains in some progressive circles a believe that if only our technoscientific knowledge could be harnessed and a ‘green economy’ created, we would enter a new age of human development. However, as Max finds out, dynamics of power remain: A Wild Thing questions his favoritism of Carol and asks “Can I be your favorite color?” No matter how many solar panels we may make, we as a global community, still need to deal with and find justice in matters of class, race, ‘gender’, ‘sex’, and sexuality.

In even universalizing systems, difference must be accounted for. Difference is an important developmental step to undergo also. How does one deal with ‘difference’? Usually we call it ‘evil’, heretical, bad, impure, ‘against nature’, ‘them’, etc. Max is no different. He separates the Wild Things into Good Guys and Bad Guys. This escalates from a play fight to a real fight and real violences and hurt. Again—I want to support many interpretations of this movie and I understand that individual interior battles and national political policies have overlap and there are many ways to view Max’s interactions with the Wild Things.

Most importantly, Max finally makes his transition. This occurs, unsurprisingly enough within the belly of a Wild Thing. This is the travel into death. The belly of the beast, The Grave, the Death Star’s trash compactor, Jonah’s Whale, Christ’s descent into Hades, and womb imagery and thus ‘born again’ language is the place of transition in many myths and Max is no different. It is here that he ‘faces’ Carol and has his vision or full repentance moment. He is pulled from the mouth reborn.

His first act is to find Carol quickly knowing he must return to his ‘real family’ and not finding Carol leaves his heart again. Mirroring the risk of giving his heart to his sister and overcoming his need to have his name proclaimed, he places a “C” in a heart shape for Carol to find.

But he cannot stay here. He has transformed. Carol finds the heart as Max renounces his Kingship.
Carol, the embodiment of Max’s old childish egotism cannot meet Max. He is already sailing for home and like we all must do, Max can only see his childhood years from a distance. We cannot say goodbye to our old selves, for we have moved on before we know it. Grief, repentance, or ego dissolution can accomplish this transformation of our person and no matter how we transform we are left to look at a distance at our old selves.

And how will we relate to our old self? The Wild Thing who is a Bull, figuring perhaps as the full grown and mature personality that Max will grow into asks Max: “Will you say nice things about us?” Max says he will.
We must look back at ourselves with forgiveness and mercy. The same compassion that we must extend to all life includes our pasts. Without regret and shame.

Max returns to the real world, barking at a neighborhood dog. He has changed but that does not mean he must leave his playfulness and joy behind. One may be childish without being a boor or self important.

His mother greets him at the door and no words are exchanged. This is the triumph of a script: allow the words to be said with knowing faces. They look at each other a mother and her reborn son. The movie closes as Max now watches his mother fall asleep, experiencing his mother as a separate entity—also human, fallible, vulnerable.

So I’ve gone on too long about this movie. But I loved it. Great acting, music, visuals, script…

And it has spiritual impact upon me. I’m cool with people disliking this movie, as with any other movie. However: I beg that one who dislikes the movie first question how they engage any movie that deals with mortality and the spiritual quest that underlies ethics. For I’m of the belief that without a clear stance on one’s feelings towards death and the mythic adventurous we undertake as humans love is stunted.
And love is what its all about after all.

Ryan McGivern

Someone pinch my nipple and tell me this is real.  A breathtaking true life stop motion animation by Blu and David Ellis:

Thanks for the tip, Horses.

Shiver me timbers.  One. Long. Incredible. Take.

As regular Mindflowers readers might know, I get wet over this stuff:

I inquired politely if I could snap a photograph and he responded in an excitable, deep Texan and follicly muffled voice, “If I can take one of you.”

There are many people in the world.
Some, say The Eurythmics, just want to abuse you.
Some will give you bacterial meningitis.
There is one person however who will do you no wrong.
Besides Buddha and Kahil Gibran that is.

She is like the wind.
Or rather, she is like the sunshine.
Maybe like a spring rain.
Or a cloud. But a fluffy cloud. Not the sad kind.

Scratch that. She is not a meteorological or natural event at all.
She is like a lazer beam. Or a microwave oven.
Or maybe neither. Anyway, she is not like a moldy towel.

Her name is Saunia Powell and lemme tell you:
you should meet her.
Seriously. You think that you’ve got life all wrapped up and figured out don’t you?
Well get ready to have your mind exploded because you don’t know jack taint
about nuthin’ until you meet Saunia Powell.

So in your plans for the next year, alongside your trip to see your cousin in Topeka, make time to meet
Saunia Powell.

You won’t regret it.

 

*Saunia Powell likes tea but not coffee. Take her out for a nice tea, won’t you?
*Saunia Powell likes the sunshine, but for Chrissakes, she’ll sunburn if she’s out too long. Be a dear won’t you and bring some SPF 40.

 

Ryan McGivern

This new Turkish game show look like a beaut.  I don’t own a television, but if there where an American version of this I’d consider getting one of those new thousand inch plasmas.

From CBC News:

A new game show on Turkish television will pit a Greek Orthodox priest, a rabbi, an imam and a Buddhist monk against one another in attempt to convert atheists to their respective religions.

In each episode of Penitents Compete, to be broadcast by Turkey’s Kanal T television station in September, the four faith guides will try to persuade 10 atheists of the merits and truth of their creeds.

The show’s producers say there is a good chance none of the atheists will be converted, Turkey’s Hurriyet Daily News and Economic Review reports.

But those who are will be sent on a pilgrimage. New Muslims will head to Mecca, Buddhists to Tibet and Jews and Christians to Jerusalem – with television cameras following them.

“They can’t see this trip as a getaway but as a religious experience,” Ahmet Ozdemir, Kanal T’s deputy director, told Hurriyet.

That’s because only true non-believers need apply. An eight-member team of theologians will vet contestants to ensure they really are atheists before deciding who will participate in the show.

Click here for the complete article, as well as users comments.

Before you scream at your President about a given issue, it may behoove you to know what you’re screaming about.
It took me ten seconds to find out that Joe Wilson was wrong.

H.R. 3200: Sec 246 — NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS

Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

Read more for yourself:
http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/seven-falsehoods-about-health-care/

What is Wilson like as a Representative? Let’s check his voting record.

  • Voted NO on giving mental health full equity with physical health. (Mar 2008)
  • Voted NO on Veto override: Extend SCHIP to cover 6M more kids. (Jan 2008)
  • Voted NO on adding 2 to 4 million children to SCHIP eligibility. (Oct 2007)
  • Voted NO on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D. (Jan 2007)
  • Voted YES on denying non-emergency treatment for lack of Medicare co-pay. (Feb 2006)
  • Voted YES on limiting medical malpractice lawsuits to $250,000 damages. (May 2004)
  • Voted YES on limited prescription drug benefit for Medicare recipients. (Nov 2003)
  • Voted NO on allowing reimportation of prescription drugs. (Jul 2003)
  • Voted YES on small business associations for buying health insurance. (Jun 2003)
  • Voted YES on capping damages & setting time limits in medical lawsuits. (Mar 2003)
  • Limit anti-trust lawsuits on health plans and insurers. (Mar 2002)
  • Rated 11% by APHA, indicating a anti-public health voting record. (Dec 2003)
  • Establish a national childhood cancer database. (Mar 2007)

Read more yourself:
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Joe_Wilson.htm

Oh, and more voting by Wilson:
Voted NO on increasing minimum wage to $7.25. (Jan 2007)

Rated 13% by the AFL-CIO, indicating an anti-union voting record. (Dec 2003)

  • Rated 0% by the AU, indicating opposition to church-state separation. (Dec 2006)
  • Recognize Christianity’s importance to western civilization. (Dec 2007)
  • Rated 0% by the ARA, indicating an anti-senior voting record. (Dec 2003)
  • Rated 0% by the CTJ, indicating opposition to progressive taxation. (Dec 2006)
  • Voted YES on making the Bush tax cuts permanent. (Apr 2002)
  • Voted NO on providing $70 million for Section 8 Housing vouchers. (Jun 2006)
  • Voted NO on revitalizing severely distressed public housing. (Jan 2008)
  • Rated 17% by the ACLU, indicating an anti-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
  • Rated 22% by the NAACP, indicating an anti-affirmative-action stance. (Dec 2006)
  • Rated 10% by the NEA, indicating anti-public education votes. (Dec 2003)
  • Voted NO on $84 million in grants for Black and Hispanic colleges. (Mar 2006)

SUMMARY:
Hard working people who are facing tough realities of a bad economy, Joe Wilson is against you. Families who work day to day and just want to keep their children healthy, Joe Wilson is against you.

Companies who profit off you and your children’s illnesses have Joe Wilson’s support.

This is a representative who yells “You lie” over a fact that anyone who cares one iota about the health care bill knows already. Did he not read the bill? Or is he so ready to protect big insurance companies and keep health care costs high that he’ll sacrifice his and his state’s reputation?

Where’s he getting his money anyway?
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?type=C&cid=N00024809&newMem=N&cycle=2010

American Hospital Assn $7,000 $0 $7,000
AstraZeneca PLC, (Pharmaceuticals) $2,500 $0 $2,500
Health Professionals $19,000 $3,500 $15,500
Hospitals/Nursing Homes $9,000 $2,000 $7,000
Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $5,500 $0 $5,500
Insurance $4,750 $3,750 $1,000

By far his largest “Sector Total” for contributions come from
‘Health’:

Health Total: $34,250

Who is Joe Wilson protecting? South Carolina’s honest and hard working families or Health Industry Big Business?

Whimsical and innocent, subtle and provocative, Coral Silverman captures the fantasy and beauty of nature and juxtaposes it with commericialistic self indulgance.

Cell Phone and Deer, 2009 Gouache on paper, 9 x 12

Cell Phone and Deer, 2009 Gouache on paper, 9" x 12"

The Unicorn in Captivity,gouache on paper, 14" x 20"

The Unicorn in Captivity, gouache on paper, 14" x 20"

FloraBlackMetrocard, gouache on paper, 20" x 20"

FloraBlackMetrocard, gouache on paper, 20" x 20"

Next Page »