Art


h0m-R came home to to a housewarming party of the termites who had moved in the night before. There was mariachi music being played by a gaggle of cockroaches dressed as geese, glitter covering everything, Lindsay Lohan digging through the garbage, and h0m-R’s husband Glenor Glenda Glengarry Glen Ross standing in the middle of it all looking frazzled.
“Boy what a day I’ve had.” said h0m-R.
“What’s that? You like my new haircut? Thanks for noticing, h0m-R.” said Glenor.
“I’m sorry if I seem distracted. I may have caused the end of humanity. Oh! kabobs!”
Glenor signalled the mariachis to stop and the termites took a break from their dancing to nibble on Glenor’s clogs. “What’s all this about humanity’s demise?”
“I sang a song of sixpence until I sang down the Deus Machinas’ straw houses of wakefulness. In their divine slumber they dreamt of how nice it would be to be rid of humans and now I feel horrible.” He sighed heavily and sunk into a quickly disappearing wooden chair.
“There’s still humans?” Glenor asked. “I thought they passed quietly into extinction after the Pancake Breakfast Tragedy.”
“They had.” said h0m-R, ”But unfortunately, some life inspiring genetic material was left in a McDLT box that had once kept the cold side cold and the hot side hot. The box was put into the hands of a gun loving seal and during a NRA meeting the speakers simultaneously threw red herring while relaying the fantasy of protecting one’s seal family from a home-invading seal clubber. Wham! the hot and cold sides became lukewarm and kazaam! a restart to the human species.”
“That was a pretty special seal.” Glenor said with awe.
“Yeah and when I was done invading his home and clubbing him to death his pelt made a great coon-skin cap….Glenor, I feel horrible about this whole thing. You’ve got to help me figure out how to change the GreatTechs’ omniscient minds about killing off the entire human species!”

Glenor and h0m-R let the party continue without them as they retired to the veranda for some mint juleps and Orange Julius.

Glenor: I don’t even see why you want to save these humans anyway. You’re HyQ!
h0m-R: I have a little bit of human in me!
Glenor: You had a human appendix and had it removed after it got infected and threatened to kill you.
h0m-R: Yes, but I had it reattached to my coupling unit. And being human is more than just body parts. Being human takes place in the heart.
Glenor: Even if you have an iguana/parrot hybrid heart?
h0m-R: Especially if you have an iguana/parrot hybrid heart.
Glenor: I’ve almost got an idea. (he takes a big glup of mint julep) Okay. I’ve got it!

Glenor stood up and jumped on top of the patio furniture which was rapidly turning into sawdust beneath his feet. “You go and convince those clock-work Gods to show grace to humanity by revealing the complex wonderousness of humanity in the only way possible!”
“You mean I go and tell them an epic tale of a sailor soldier returning home from war to his beloved family?” h0m-R excitedly clapped his hands together like a gun-crazed-seal at the ends of the gun lobby’s marionette strings.
“No. You show them porn!” Glenor ripped off his shirt to show off his external iguana/parrot hybrid heart. “After all, when it comes to finicky and tempestuous gods, you’ve got to razzle dazzle ‘em!….
Give ‘em the old razzle dazzle
Razzle Dazzle ‘em
Stream ‘em a vid with lots of flesh in it
With a Swede who’s moaning passionate
Give ‘em a crowd that’s mewing ‘poke us’
Bead and pearl ’em
How can they see with DNA in their eyes?
What if your new age gods are all fitful?
Just give ‘em a jockey who takes a fistful!
Razzle dazzle ‘em
And cram some porn in their eyes!”

“That’s a horrible idea! Porn is a disgusting blight upon the multiiverse!” h0m-R said, while watching porn on his TV, laptop, iPhone, cell phone, and imagination.
“Well, I’m all out of ideas. So you’re on your own.”

That night, h0m-R walked the city streets with a saxophonist following him playing “Yakety Sax”.
“Can you please not play that? I can’t hear myself think!” He screamed.
“Sorry.” The saxophonist said and began playing ”Baker Street”.
“That’s better.”

H0m-R and the saxophonist made their way to the Museum and inside found a retrospective of Ad Reinhardt and the saxophonist made a sad “waa waa” noise and children staggered about holding their aching heads. On the second floor near the hard-to-find bathrooms with new hand dryers which got more comments and enjoyment than anything Ellsworth Kelly could ever dream of, there was a room whose dimensions could not be measured. 

Sitting inside were eight women who looked very small due to the infinitely high ceiling being vaulted. The saxophonist began playing Icehouse’s “Electric Blue” sax solo. 

“Who are you?” h0m-R asked.
“We’re the Muses!” they said in unison.

Thaleia: Hi. I’m the muse of comedy. If you ever talk to Larry the Cable Guy, tell him I have a special place in hell waiting for him.
Melpomene: Oh! May my name be never remembered! I am the muse of tragedy. Woe!
Erato: Hi there, sailors. I’m the muse of erotic poetry….but now mostly just drunk dirty talk.
Terpsichore: And I’m the muse of dance. I have never been to Minnesota.
Polymnia: Sacred music is my game. You can thank me for coming up with the idea of having dreary church hymns with eight verses that go on so long that you miss the first half of the football game.
Ourania: And you’d better thank your lucky stars for me–the Muse of astrology! Get it?
Thaleia: That’s horrible.
Melpomene: Almost as bad as Larry the Cable Guy! (stabs self)
Kleio: And I’m ‘history’….Well, actually, Melpomene is. Get it? Ha!
Thaleia: You know, I give up on all of you.
Kalliope: And I am the Muse of EPIC POETRY.
h0m-R: Epic.

So the h0m-R told the Muses of his predicament and asked them for their help and favor. The Muses came together in a huddle and put their togas literally together and their minds together figuratively. It was decided that h0m-R would be assigned a muse’s patronage and aid and succor and inspiration.

Kalliope addressed h0m-R, and making use of grand sweeping gestures, announced: “You will be assigned Euterpe, Muse of Flute Playing!”
“What the hell?!” said h0m-R.
“Cool.” said the saxophonist.
“Who are you anyway? Get outta here!” h0m-R screamed. The saxophonist walked glumly away playing the sax solo from Spandau Ballet’s “True”.
“This must be a mistake! Who is this Euterpe?”
Kalliope pointed at the door that was closing behind the saxophonist. “That was Euterpe, the mighty and Most Powerful and Revered Muse Of All.”
h0m-R wept.
“Boy did I screw up! There’s no way she’s going to help me now!”
“Tragic, isn’t it?” asked Melpomene from a spreading pool of blood.

h0m-R left the Museum with an overpriced coffee table book from the gift shop titled “How to Placate the Gods”. He flipped open the book and saw: ”Chapter One: Razzle Dazzle ‘Em” and thought about it for a moment and then looked at Chapter Two where he found written: “Tell Them an Epic Tale of a Sailor Soldier Returning Home From War to His Beloved Family.”

“Hmmm.” said h0m-R. “I shoulda thought of that.”

Thinking Through and Feeling Where the Wild Things Are

In my analysis of this splendid film, I want to state first off that I understand that I’m pulling some heavy interpretations that may come across like a 1:1 metaphorical statement about what the film is saying. While I believe that these insights into the film can help flesh out one way of seeing the film, I am totally open to many interpretations and understandings of it. That is a mark of good film: Debate and various parsings. What I do want to dissuade others from is a quick dismissal of the film as ‘depressing’, or ‘dark’.

When I have heard or read others’ reactions to the film including that it is boring, depressing, etc. I have not heard them relate to the film in its mythic level. This to me seems telling when the movie is essentially a step by step hero’s journey with resonances of course to pop-psych, religious, and spiritual motifs. If there are reviews of the film which include why it fails as a mythic quest, I have not seen them and I welcome being turned on to them.

So let me pull no punches. Right off I’ll tell you that I quickly saw the film taking a ‘vision quest’ or hero’s journey type of narrative. This influenced my entire viewing and once I’d locked onto that format, it was hard for me to not see it otherwise. This is the trap of all rigid worldviews, isn’t it? Well, I’m guilty here. But I will say that it made the movie flow quite coherently and endearingly so with fresh interpretations and statements about many of our contemporary conditions.

I’ll also say there’s a bounty of spoilers ahead. If you haven’t seen it, stop here. Also: what’s up with people saying this is or isn’t a children’s movie? Why is that even on the radar? “Because of the book it derives its title and images from, you dullard!” you scream back. But Jonze has repeatedly said that it is an adult’s movie that is about childhood so enough of that. I would say that the youngest a person could be and enjoy the film would be roughly around ten years old.

So anywho: Max, the protagonist (and white male hero figure—haven’t we had enough of these? Didn’t Keanu kind of put the exclamation mark on that stereotype?) is a youth on the cusp of puberty and is living in a fantasy world of unbridled energy. He terrorizes the family dog, he believes that other’s attention should be unwavering from him, that his mother is an extension of himself, and that other’s should play by his own rules (the snowball fight that escalates to a level that is beyond his control or comfort). Ultimately, he is an unchecked ego in the full exuberance of childhood.

But his world is crumbling around him. His sister has developed friendships and possibly romantic interests that are consuming her attention. His mother and father are divorced and mother’s new romantic interest is invading the pacific and Max centered family unit.

We are to understand that Max’s life is an island where his needs and identity rule unchecked. Even from the title card credits, Max has scrawled his name over the production houses’ logos. His name gets etched into the boat, and he plants a garbage bag flag on his snow pile like a colonizing Lord. His interest in self expression and unique spirit are not at issue here. It is his inability to be responsive to the shared social world he is slowly being birthed into. He is reaching the ‘age of accountability’, individuation from his mother, and connecting his actions to consequences.

A number of important events lead to his hero’s journey or spur him on to his crises among the Wild Things.
He learns of the mortality or changingness of all things. Everything changes, flows, dies, transforms. Marriages dissolve, sisters grow up, new relationships begin, and the childhood years of irresponsibility ultimately end. This is a core tenet to many spiritual teachings. This knowledge pushes one to focus on the bedrock values within themselves and their society. Max is faced with not only the mortality of himself and others around him, but the world and indeed the solar system when the Sun itself will transform. We must come to terms with our Earth’s future demise—and face an ethical response to it and the other life that lives on it. Will we cower at this with ignorance or apathy? Will we foolheartedly welcome it with misguided apocalypticism, dreaming of a blood drenched and sword welding Christ? Or will we dissolve ego, see past the lies of a culture of rabid consumption, and humble ourselves in compassion? Anywho, I digress. Max sees death before him, like Guatama on his chariot ride.

Max experiences fear of loss. He had given his heart (in card form) to his sister. When his sister ‘betrays’ him by not standing up for him and his defeated snow fort, he tramples on the card he had made for his sister. His destruction of the heart shaped card is intended to hurt his sister but it hurts him also. One may never lash out at another, hate another, or withdraw love from another without harming oneself, after all. With the help of mom, he performs a mea culpa and tries to restore his sister’s room to its previous condition but as we know physical damages may be patched up but the emotional and psychological effects will ripple much longer. The buildings and neighborhood of New Orleans can and will be restored, but what of the people living there who experienced the largely racialized betrayal of their government? His loss of his sister and the loss of his mother are largely connected—as well as the loss of the father we can presume who is not seen in the film. His repentance towards his sister is connected also to the third event…

Max commits violences towards his mother. Standing on a table he screams, “Feed me woman!” Is this a gendered attack that he had heard from his father? The leering wolf-suited Max stars at his mother from the kitchen table, the demanding male in a house whose status as ‘head’ is being challenged all around. After the divorce, perhaps Max had become accustomed to being the only male presence in the house and now he’s got mother’s new boyfriend in the other room drinking wine and laughing. Max then lashes out and bites his mother-the mouth that like Remus and Romulus had suckled from a wolf had nursed at his mother is now like a wolf biting her. He then runs away into the night and thus begins his journey.

Like any good mythic journey, we’ve got to traverse water—the symbol of the unconscious. He sets off in escape, or adventure? We know that his is a journey that will resolve in his return. This is a circular journey, following the Eastern narrative. The hero leaves, finds his boon, wisdom, transformation, spirit animal, or weapon and returns to his fold.

The first thing Max sees is a fire on the hill. Is this civilization? Hope? A warming fire? No, it is destruction and madness. Appropriately Max finds Carol (the Wild Thing representing his dominant characteristics) crushing bird-nest-like houses. What should be sheltering and a symbol of safety is being crushed by Carol’s actions. I won’t get into too much detail (really?) about the Wild Things, but Max finds semblances of his sister, mother, facets of himself, and presumably others there. These are his spirit animals, perhaps, or his more properly his ‘demons’ in need of taming and stand-ins for the others in his life which he must live with ethically.

Max is crowned King. Of course! This is his new snow fort, his world and he is the unquestioned ruler of it. This is the seductive power of the Dark Side, if I may borrow from Yoda. It is a human experience to want to rule, command, dictate. We may not seek CEO positions or great wealth. We don’t need to. This comes in many expressions: wanting to win each argument, defend yourself when you’re in the wrong, disregard others, etc. The Wild Things reveal that many kings have died and been eaten by them. As it is! Yes, the combat we must face daily with our desire to be right, be served, be gluttons, be God’s ‘elect’, be ‘better than’, is mortal combat. It is perilous. Max will only survive in the end by giving up his crown and declining kingship. This is the Christ teaching that we can all emulate. By accepting a crown of hardship and service to the marginalized and cast-off rather than glory we can survive and succeed in honor.

Max then goes through a journey that has meaning at personal, familial, and political levels.
He tries to create a mono culture—a universal and totalizing system. He is King and his saying is final. This is the desire of egoistic systems—Hegelianism, reductive materialism, maculinist systems of power, exclusivist religious systems, etc. This does not work. Communities, relationships, and power dynamics occlude a universalized or single, easy answer.
Max tries by his design to create a Utopian community. Again, a ‘city’ (really just a bigger bird’s nest) is made with hopes that technology and progress will cure the ‘ailments’ of ethical relations. It does not. There remains in some progressive circles a believe that if only our technoscientific knowledge could be harnessed and a ‘green economy’ created, we would enter a new age of human development. However, as Max finds out, dynamics of power remain: A Wild Thing questions his favoritism of Carol and asks “Can I be your favorite color?” No matter how many solar panels we may make, we as a global community, still need to deal with and find justice in matters of class, race, ‘gender’, ‘sex’, and sexuality.

In even universalizing systems, difference must be accounted for. Difference is an important developmental step to undergo also. How does one deal with ‘difference’? Usually we call it ‘evil’, heretical, bad, impure, ‘against nature’, ‘them’, etc. Max is no different. He separates the Wild Things into Good Guys and Bad Guys. This escalates from a play fight to a real fight and real violences and hurt. Again—I want to support many interpretations of this movie and I understand that individual interior battles and national political policies have overlap and there are many ways to view Max’s interactions with the Wild Things.

Most importantly, Max finally makes his transition. This occurs, unsurprisingly enough within the belly of a Wild Thing. This is the travel into death. The belly of the beast, The Grave, the Death Star’s trash compactor, Jonah’s Whale, Christ’s descent into Hades, and womb imagery and thus ‘born again’ language is the place of transition in many myths and Max is no different. It is here that he ‘faces’ Carol and has his vision or full repentance moment. He is pulled from the mouth reborn.

His first act is to find Carol quickly knowing he must return to his ‘real family’ and not finding Carol leaves his heart again. Mirroring the risk of giving his heart to his sister and overcoming his need to have his name proclaimed, he places a “C” in a heart shape for Carol to find.

But he cannot stay here. He has transformed. Carol finds the heart as Max renounces his Kingship.
Carol, the embodiment of Max’s old childish egotism cannot meet Max. He is already sailing for home and like we all must do, Max can only see his childhood years from a distance. We cannot say goodbye to our old selves, for we have moved on before we know it. Grief, repentance, or ego dissolution can accomplish this transformation of our person and no matter how we transform we are left to look at a distance at our old selves.

And how will we relate to our old self? The Wild Thing who is a Bull, figuring perhaps as the full grown and mature personality that Max will grow into asks Max: “Will you say nice things about us?” Max says he will.
We must look back at ourselves with forgiveness and mercy. The same compassion that we must extend to all life includes our pasts. Without regret and shame.

Max returns to the real world, barking at a neighborhood dog. He has changed but that does not mean he must leave his playfulness and joy behind. One may be childish without being a boor or self important.

His mother greets him at the door and no words are exchanged. This is the triumph of a script: allow the words to be said with knowing faces. They look at each other a mother and her reborn son. The movie closes as Max now watches his mother fall asleep, experiencing his mother as a separate entity—also human, fallible, vulnerable.

So I’ve gone on too long about this movie. But I loved it. Great acting, music, visuals, script…

And it has spiritual impact upon me. I’m cool with people disliking this movie, as with any other movie. However: I beg that one who dislikes the movie first question how they engage any movie that deals with mortality and the spiritual quest that underlies ethics. For I’m of the belief that without a clear stance on one’s feelings towards death and the mythic adventurous we undertake as humans love is stunted.
And love is what its all about after all.

Ryan McGivern

Someone pinch my nipple and tell me this is real.  A breathtaking true life stop motion animation by Blu and David Ellis:

Thanks for the tip, Horses.

Whimsical and innocent, subtle and provocative, Coral Silverman captures the fantasy and beauty of nature and juxtaposes it with commericialistic self indulgance.

Cell Phone and Deer, 2009 Gouache on paper, 9 x 12

Cell Phone and Deer, 2009 Gouache on paper, 9" x 12"

The Unicorn in Captivity,gouache on paper, 14" x 20"

The Unicorn in Captivity, gouache on paper, 14" x 20"

FloraBlackMetrocard, gouache on paper, 20" x 20"

FloraBlackMetrocard, gouache on paper, 20" x 20"

You can read Jenna Busch’s entire review of “Inglourious Basterds” at the Huffington Post here:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jenna-busch/review-iinglourious-baste_b_254797.html

“Occasionally I found myself thinking that a few of the shots where a character’s name is written across the screen with an arrow pointing them out could have been cut.”
In keeping with the theme of history being redacted continually and any cultural identity being manifold layers of editors’ efforts, this film strives to convey a Multi-Editor effect. There is a narrator who does not appear in the film (Samuel L. Jackson) and who only appears twice in the film. The multiple title styles are for the same effect. It is as though through the process of creating the film, editors could not decide on who in the film was important and how to introduce them. The final and most extreme expression of this is the hand-scrawled arrow pointing.

 ”A friend pointed out that the David Bowie song during one of the pivotal scenes may have been a bit too modern and out of place, though I’ve heard opinions on both sides of that argument.”
The movie begins with an obvious Spaghetti Western score signalling that this movie is going to draw from any genre it likes to get its point(s) across. To criticize the scoring as overly ecclectic seems to miss that this movie is not about a time nor place. This is not a “war movie” anymore than Dr. Strangelove is a war movie though many reviews credit as being so, and it is certainly not a WWII movie. It is a playful meta-movie about an alternate universe to convey themes of the nature and role of cinema in myth making. Huzzah for Bowie!

 

Ryan McGivern

Can a movie which moves one to tears, make one laugh, and be the most important movie to see in a theatre
in years be ‘not good’? 
Yes. If that movie is Not a Movie and Not to Be Enjoyed. 

First, let me say why Inglourious Basterds is Not to Be Enjoyed.
It is a condemnation of humanity, a statement that we are blind to the shifting sands of public imagination and the re-writing of ’history’, and moreover want to be fed propaganda that supports us.
As I walked from the theatre and heard people laughing, I was overcome with sadness. I felt like people were walking from an important statement about the corruption of the world, a self-knowing argument that cinema is the contemporary weapon of choice and that there will always be a vicious circle of destruction. 
This movie plays with the idea that ’history’ is a created narrative, not a firm science. We grab unto myths, easy tellings that placate us, support our immediate agendas, and mythologize the hero and the villian.
Revenge movies are no different from our status quo hegemonic national identity. But that’s a hard pill to swallow.
What is the United States if not the world’s unblemished liberator and knight in shining democratic armor? 
Our approved history becomes seamlessly woven with popular consciousness largely through the cinema house. 
In the film, the question is posed, “What will the history books say of us?” and the next shot is of the cinema house.
Again, in the basement scene when they are playing ’Who Am I?’ the nosy German decides through his questions that he must either be “The African American Slave Narrative” or “King Kong”. 
How can popular consciousness decide the difference between ’what happened’ and the ‘the way mass media is portraying the story at the moment’?   

Inglourious Basterds is one of the most preachy movies I’ve seen in a while. I usually don’t like when a movie is telling me so plainly the ‘concept’ of the production. I like it when a movie hides, obscures, and artfully discloses truths to me rather than smashing an idea over my head with a baseball bat. But, I do give credit to the film for conveying a hard truth, one that is unenjoyable, one that condemns.

We, the audience are made out to be no different from the Nazis portrayed in the film. The two times that we see through the camera’s eye is when it is the view of dying or tortured Nazis. Our lust for power, our desire for revenge, and our willingness to throw others aside as we rewrite history to our liking makes us all guilty and deserving of vengeance.
(The issues of revenge and grace permeate Tarantino’s films and they are perhaps most plainly stated here.)
If only we all could have swatikas branded into our foreheads! If only our hates, our delight in the privilege handed us whether through class, race, ‘gender’, ‘sexual orientation’, our bigotry could be cast into the light! Rather, we duck and hide behind the current myths of ‘American equality’ and ‘post racial America’.
This is not a movie to be enjoyed, but one that is meant to shock, hurt, prophesy.

This movie is Not a Movie. It jumps into a meta level of being about itself and the role of cinema so much that it becomes a cobbled together message-movie. Tarantino has said that after viewing “There Will Be Blood” he wanted to ‘up his game’–if by this he meant that he wanted to create a great movie, he has failed. The characters herein are fun, playful, larger than life, and memorable no doubt. However, there is so much winking and reference that no one can be taken seriously (even the stunning performance of Christoph Waltz). Yes, as many have already written there are a lot of filmic references in the film–and I would ask where is the line between film-loving homage and spoof?

Is the movie powerful? Yes.
Is it worth seeing in the theatre? Yes. It is a powerful experience to see with others in the public square.
Is it worth seeing at home? Shrug. Waltz gives a good performance and the Basement Who Am I Scene is a textbook exposition on how to create tension in film.

As for Tarantino, I’m interested to see him make another film along the lines of Jackie Brown. If he truly wants to “up his game” he will be required to go in this direction rather than an overly preachy film that will only delight Freshman Level Film Class students.

Bottom Line: History is myth, cinema is myth production, the film strip is more powerful than the sword, everyone is equally deserving of vengeance….oh and two other things:

1) The cinema remains the most important role in American myth creation and yet the cinema is dying. The theatre house is threatened by personal media delivery and its continued existence is like that of the Personal Automobile–not supported by anything other than habit. Yet, unlike American Car Culture there is a need for some public arena to experience myth, ritual, and community narrative and memory.

2) NO ONE CAN MEANINGFULLY CALL ANYONE A NAZI ANYMORE. This is perfect timing for this movie. Though people are throwing out the accusation of “This person’s a Nazi!” as easily as ordering a milkshake, it is absolutely meaningless. I saw a young person the other week wearing a backpack with the image of a Confederate Flag. His obviously hipster chic ensemble said to me that he had no idea that it was associated with anything other than The Dukes of Hazard. The real threat that racism and white privilege poses to America, I feel, is no longer tied to the images of the Civil War, Segregation, the South, etc. Whether this is good or bad needs to be decided by America’s families, faith communities and education system. How did we get here? What happened to the world that allowed over 6 million Jews to be murdered? Can we allow the swastika to become just another symbol that eventually will be worn ironically by the future iterations of hipsters with images of Inglorious Basterds in their minds?
Our villians will change. Our cinematic bad guys may not always wear black and our real life oppressors and criminals do not have swastikas carved in their heads. How do we express our desires, values, and strive for justice without ourselves falling prey to the bloodlust of vengeance and speaking in such hyperbole and bombast that those we oppose become caricatures of villians that never were?

Ryan McGivern

“100% Vegetarianism Daily”
By: Anonymous Kind Looking Street Prophet

Vegetable Mineral Ethereal
Plants Universe Space
We chemically all dissolve back into
But! 7 years of this diet is sure to take 50-100% of your DNA soul material

Back into God’s Genesis 1:29-30 salvation plan.
50-100% more salvation w/ all 3
No less.
Attention: UFO, UN, England Axis, USA, Spain, Allies
Enforce For Everything’s own good.
New Testament God says “Behold I stand at the gate.” “I am the vine.”
(Seedless) (See Deathless)
See over all. Please more.
100% Vegetarianism daily.
100% Iron Daily.
100% Magnet Massages Daily.
(Notice that God is ¾ good. Genesis 1:31)
Get a new body from food before rigor mortis
(4-6 hours after heart stops)
But Vegetarians bodies do not.
Trains your body material to feel earth’s core of iron radiation and magnetic field
which trains sould material to feel touch of other souls in space-not die from alone.
Nothing to do.

Alive until resurrected by iron in cells magnetized by magnet massages/waist, neck, ankle.
Wristbands of magnets extra strong hardware—drugstores.
Difference between body and soul.
REVELATIONS LOGIC
WORKS COMPLETE
Also, much body weight of food we eat go out of our body every seven years.
Also, they get rigor mortis whether you’re ready or not.

Salvation is 100% vegetarianism daily.
The difference between soul and body
the meat eater gets stiff in rigor mortis
and its material touches common material and stars and planets come apart
until the universe ends.
“One nation under God” Constitution preamble
Genesis 1:29-30
100% iron daily to magnetize and teach cell stuff to heed the other being of earth’s
magnetic field
and iron core radiation go through all earth.
UFOs see other UFOs in stars shaped like antennae heads and they stop all life back
to mineral kingdom to stop death.
Head of Orion
Sons of God and Earthlings Antennae head of Orion
Antennae Head Etacyenus
Sons of Man and Both do God’s get straight before no change for suns
and Planets in future plan or we all going to find what wternally keeps happening to us:
Minus memory.
As we change with every new day so as our habits gotta get some rest, sleep, relaxation.
My boss says “a change is better than a rest.”
760 degrees Fahrenheit below Zero
all black structureless space material alone as meat eaters in rigor moris and all common touch by the (thou shall not kill
Heaven and thou Shall Not Kill Earth)
meat eaters kill God.
Vegetarian (Animal) Vegetable mineal (Universe) Ethereal (Kosmos) Common
Touch faint personality
TETRAHEDRONS OF SMALLEST POSSIBLE SIZE
souls trained when taken into universe by heed touch of magnetic field
of iron core fusion radiation to carry on in structureless ether
the God Common Touch Live.
On Earth as it is in heaven—no such thing—all feels forever—same as we chemically
dissolve into space stuff again but electro-magnetic into iron and vegetables
fed dead bodies plus ground up meat eaters with their familiar food material
and carbon and iron dust
magnetized strong enough to wake the dead.

WHY ON EARTH DOES GOD HAVE TO PAINT? / CENTRIPETAL ART
By Rafael Chodos, Based on Selected Works and Writings of JUNKO CHODOS
Giotto Multimedia, 2009
———————–

Rafael Chodos’ Why on Earth Does God Have to Paint?/ Centripetal Art acts as a baptism into the post-modern landscape of junctures of art and religion. Troubling and formative, it is nothing short of a crisis point between what has come before and the promises that lie ahead. While clear in its spiritual direction, it is immediately accessible to spiritual aspirants of many traditions.  The author, husband of internationally celebrated artist Junko Chodos, has initiated a delightful and thoroughly post-modern midrashic project upon her art that through traditional and web-based publication will aid future forays into art and theology.
Like the best of post-modern spiritual inquiries, this book defies easy categorization and eschews being definitive or prescriptive in favor of authentically and humbly offering possibilities for the spiritual seeker and artist. And it has an uneasy prophetic power:  Junko Chodos’ art calls to spiritual refugees across our contemporary landscape with an exhilarating corpus of work reflective of the aspirations of a twenty-first century mysticism.
This book is an exploration of the life, spiritual journey, and mission of Junko Chodos and the art that her ardent spirit has forged. Included is a processional of the visitants, or iconic themes present in Junko’s art, biographies of both Junko and Rafael Chodos, treatments upon her style and process, and a stirring description of the artist’s vision of centripetal art and integrity as foundational to her art. With intertextual sensibility Rafael deftly includes private correspondence of the artist, studio notebooks and diaries reflecting the contemporary consciousness that rends text, welcoming readers to participate spontaneously unrestricted by genre and media expectations. More than catalog or collection, Why on Earth invites the reader to contact image and text at once rendering it an intimate and sensual engagement.
Although the book is challenging, it is a highly engaging book for even the uninitiated or the collegiate student of post-modern art and/or theology and it balances many functions. It is a post-modern treatise where readers can witness how Junko reflects the commitment to non-commercial integrity, collaboration among artists and the centrality of bodies as seen in her FATHOM project, an acute awareness of the danger and promise of technology, and the role of art in establishing justice-in-community. It also is an epistle of hope and inspiration to post-colonial theorists. Individuals who like Junko have experienced subaltern cultures, war, or the multivalent violences of consciences no longer at home within creedal religion will be livened through the reflections within the book’s reflections of Junko’s identity as spiritual refugee.
These many themes and functions find their narrative integrity here as a living archaeology of mysticism. Through their collaboration, Junko and Rafael Chodos erase prejudices, dichotomies, and limitations of the modern worldview. The political is the spiritual, the artist is the prophet, and law, justice, art, and religion are all joined by the same strivings of the human spirit. Artist, art, and viewer intimately participate in the shared return to the same spiritual center.
Central to the book’s mystic vision is centripetal art, which affirms that the human heart will ever remain undefeated by imperialism, social divisions, and dogmatism.  For whether the darkness is within an individual’s own psyche or arises from the devastations of war, yet comes the redemptive hope that art still may usher one to the center of divine presence.

The book is available at CentripetalArt.com and Amazon.com

Hello! We here at Mindflowers in the past have dicussed improv basics, but here’s just a few new musings on the basics to help you get started or thoughts to keep in mind at whatever your level.

The “Story Spine”: Using the game in pairs or larger groups where you tell a story along the major points of 1) Once upon a time…2) and every day….3) until one day….4) and then… 5) until finally….6) and since that day everyone lived happily ever after…..is very helpful to get into the idea of story arc and moving a scene along. It is helpful to note that there is a period in 1 and 2 where things are going glowingly. This can be thought of the character and relationship building period where you are also very positive (!) with your partners. This holds off conflict and lets everyone find happy spaces in their relations where rapport and the seeds of objectives can be sown through the characters.

“Raise the stakes” Mounting tension to the point of ridiculousness is a fun part of improv and a fun part of life in general. This is the way that we tell our tragic stories of our days right? “So I spilt coffee on my shirt and then guess what? I had my job performance review!” Do you feel a scene lagging? It may be that there’s a fear hiding there-a fear of taking things to a more dangerous level. But remember! Raising the stakes may not always mean making the horrors more unbelievable. It may be that things get much better. Or even to “the best!” Your partner may become endowed with being “the best” pig caller in Topeka!

“Follow the gossip” There are times when  in a scene, someone may go for the joke or begin to waffle and ‘gossip’ and make ‘nudge nudge’ comments more to the audience than in their scene. These comments can become boring and waffling should certainly be avoided in favor of action, but one way of racheting these moments up is by ‘following the gossip’. This may involve a ‘jump cut’ feel where someone off stage (or on stage) calls to see what it would look like if the ‘gossip’ would be played out. Use sparingly, of course. Its better to keep actional, stay away from jokey comments, or playing the ‘wink wink’ to your audience.

“Vulnerability” If I had anything to say to new improv-ers, it would be to remain vulnerable. Its the players who seem unflappable at their first tries at improv that must be reminded of this. It may be easy (easier than you think!) to step into a feeling of “I know what’s going on” when you’re new to improv and come across as an ‘actional’ player when really you may be forming the habit of bullying people around. I say this because I learned the hard way. Believe me-its been my bane. So I now keep in mind: ‘vulnerability is the beginning of ethics’ and I treat scenes like an ethical exercise. This doesn’t mean that I can’t play a sadist, or even an antagonist, but I do keep in mind that every character must be impressionable-otherwise their player is a tyrannt. First and foremost-listen to what has been said and let it permeate you. You may be a strong character, yes, but one must keep in mind that the scene is shared and everyone is directing it. A simple ‘in’ for me to get out of the “invulnerable dickhead” habit is to love on the other characters. This may mean that you play low status characters, or that you emphasize the ‘positivity’ and rapport in the beginning of scenes. I speak as one who has been burned by this aspect of improv.

“Trust” A good litmus test as to whether you are not trusting your fellow players is if your scenes feel like work. If it feels like “they’re just not playing the right scene!” you’re not trusting your partner. I have come to the conclusion that if the best improv-er ever just trusted their partner, something enjoyable and entertaining would arise. “But!” you may counter, “What if my partner is horrible?” The simple answer is trust. And keep to the basics: (CROW…character, relationship, objective, where) you’ll be fine. Scripting, invulnerability, waffling, they all come from a lack of trust. You will never come out looking bad if you give all to your partner.

“Give and take” This means sharing stage space. Talking with two people on stage will be a back and forth and most likely fall into an equal space sharing if both are trusting each other. When more folks are piled on stage, each must sit back and take a smaller piece of the pie. I was once in a scene where in a bakery we started out with a group of four and had good rapport and character and were sharing space and then we had four more characters added to our bakery. Everything fell apart. Why? Because there was now 8 pieces to share equally and that’s a tough challenge! But, if relationships are solid, you can rely on spatiality, gesture, bodies, touch, to express all you need without taking too big a bite out of the stage. In fact, some of my most pleasurable watching during that exercise was watching those who never said a word and were just ‘in the moment’ of the madness!

Hope some of these notes are helpful, and as I’m just a greenhorn myself, I will of course welcome comments/critiques!

It takes talent to capture a landscape that appeals to me. I want my art to toss boomerangs of provocations my way and usually all landscapes offer is vastness and serenity. Not that those are negative things, but I want my snow globe world to be shaken, you know? Brooklyn-based artist Erika Somogyi paints landscapes that fit this mold, offering depth layers beyond nature’s simplistic beauty. Enjoy. And once again, thank you my love for you is a stampede of horses for being an amazing art blog.

rockinthesea2

pastpresentfutureleft

divine-light

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.